🔗 Share this article

I have some thoughts regarding that remarks made by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz during the US Open last eight. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was understandable. Rather, Fowler brought up the continued drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But really. Suppose the American defeated the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). He said in post-match interviews after the loss that he actually preferred his path, because it offered the opportunity to beat the three best competitors in the world in succession. He is more than justified to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else in their right mind had the lack of American champions in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the world starting the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his previous six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that is as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful power on each front side and backhand are sufficiently enough to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the handful of generational talents, however, Fritz is often overmatched. The past few years has witnessed the interesting rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of smaller players. He is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a drop shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

Fritz has made a several significant, improbable advancements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years later, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing slump of American men lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

The American star achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s play in that very quarter-final should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the very end, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the brink of frustration. When Fritz eventually did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and forced him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Down match points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, only a consequence of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any version of the Serbian, who lost to the Spaniard in the next round and never especially seem like he thought he could win. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in media sessions, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, prepared to not just say how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a match, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for America not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of winning a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely unlikely for all other players. {